GATEverse Practice, past papers & mock tests

Formula Vault · EM

Engineering Mathematics

🔖
Sheet 1

Linear Algebra & Calculus

10 formulas
  • Triangular/diagonal matrix: eigenvalues are exactly the diagonal entries
  • Cayley-Hamilton: every square matrix satisfies its own characteristic equation
Rank of a Matrix ☆
\[ \text{Rank}(A) = \text{Rank}(A^T) \]
= largest order of a non-zero minor
Characteristic Equation ☆
\[ \det(A - \lambda I) = 0 \]
roots are the eigenvalues
Eigenvalue Sum & Product ☆
\[ \sum \lambda_i = \text{trace}(A) \qquad \prod \lambda_i = \det(A) \]
Orthogonal Matrix ☆
\[ A^{-1} = A^T \]
Mean Value Theorem ☆
\[ f'(c) = \frac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a} \]
L'Hopital's Rule ☆
\[ \lim \frac{f}{g} = \lim \frac{f'}{g'} \]
for 0/0 or ∞/∞ forms
Maxima / Minima Test ☆
\[ f'(x)=0,\ f''(x)>0 \Rightarrow \text{min} \qquad f'(x)=0,\ f''(x)<0 \Rightarrow \text{max} \]
Continuity at a Point ☆
\[ \lim_{x \to a} f(x) = f(a) \]
Differentiability at a Point ☆
\[ f'(a) = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(a+h)-f(a)}{h} \]
LHD = RHD for Differentiability ☆
\[ \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(a)-f(a-h)}{h} \ = \ \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(a+h)-f(a)}{h} \]
left-hand derivative must equal right-hand derivative

Can you recall the rank of a matrix formula?

Reveal formula
\[ \text{Rank}(A) = \text{Rank}(A^T) \]
Singular means a zero eigenvalue
A singular matrix (det=0) has at least one zero eigenvalue -- a matrix with all non-zero eigenvalues is always invertible.
Inverse eigenvalues are reciprocals
Eigenvalues of A^-1 are reciprocals of eigenvalues of A -- only valid when A is invertible.
L'Hopital only fits 0/0 or ∞/∞
L'Hopital only applies to 0/0 or infinity/infinity indeterminate forms -- applying it to other forms is a classic trap.
Continuity doesn't imply differentiability
Differentiability implies continuity, but continuity does NOT imply differentiability -- the reverse direction is a frequently tested trick option.
|x| is the classic counterexample
f(x)=|x| is continuous everywhere (including at x=0) but NOT differentiable at x=0 -- its LHD=-1 and RHD=+1 disagree there. The single most common example GATE uses to test the continuity-vs-differentiability distinction.
Repeated eigenvalues aren't automatically bad
Repeated eigenvalues don't automatically mean a matrix is non-diagonalizable -- check whether geometric multiplicity equals algebraic multiplicity before concluding either way.
Sheet 2

Probability & Statistics

7 formulas
Union of Events ☆
\[ P(A \cup B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A \cap B) \]
Conditional Probability ☆
\[ P(A \mid B) = \frac{P(A \cap B)}{P(B)} \]
Bayes' Theorem ☆
\[ P(A \mid B) = \frac{P(B \mid A)\,P(A)}{P(B)} \]
Expectation & Variance ☆
\[ E[X] = \sum x\,P(x) \qquad \text{Var}(X) = E[X^2] - (E[X])^2 \]
Binomial Distribution ☆
\[ P(X=k) = \binom{n}{k} p^k (1-p)^{n-k} \]
mean = np, variance = np(1−p)
Poisson Distribution ☆
\[ P(X=k) = \frac{e^{-\lambda}\lambda^k}{k!} \]
mean = variance = λ
Standard Deviation ☆
\[ \sigma = \sqrt{\text{Var}(X)} \]

Can you recall the bayes' theorem formula?

Reveal formula
\[ P(A \mid B) = \frac{P(B \mid A)\,P(A)}{P(B)} \]
Mutually exclusive ≠ independent
Mutually exclusive events are NEVER independent (unless one has probability 0) -- one of the most common probability traps on GATE. Independence requires P(A intersect B) = P(A)P(B); mutual exclusivity gives P(A intersect B) = 0, which only equals P(A)P(B) if one probability is 0.
Variance isn't linear in constants
Variance is NOT linear in the additive constant: Var(aX+b) = a^2 . Var(X), the +b vanishes.
E[XY]=E[X]E[Y] needs independence
E[XY] = E[X] . E[Y] only holds when X and Y are independent -- not in general.
'At least one' = 1 minus 'none'
'At least one success' = 1 - P(zero successes) -- almost always faster than summing every case directly, and the shortcut GATE numericals are built around.
Sheet 3

Discrete Math (Sets, Relations, Graphs, Counting)

8 formulas
2-Set Inclusion-Exclusion ☆
\[ |A \cup B| = |A|+|B|-|A \cap B| \]
3-Set Inclusion-Exclusion ☆
\[ |A\cup B\cup C| = |A|{+}|B|{+}|C|-|A{\cap}B|-|B{\cap}C|-|A{\cap}C|+|A{\cap}B{\cap}C| \]
Relations on a Set ☆
\[ \text{Relations on an } n\text{-set} = 2^{n^2} \]
Reflexive & Symmetric Relations ☆
\[ \text{Reflexive} = 2^{n^2-n} \qquad \text{Symmetric} = 2^{n(n+1)/2} \]
Counting Functions ☆
\[ |B|^{|A|} \text{ functions} \qquad \frac{|B|!}{(|B|-|A|)!} \text{ one-one} \]
one-one needs |A| ≤ |B|
Handshaking Lemma ☆
\[ \sum \deg(v) = 2|E| \]
Permutations & Combinations ☆
\[ {}^{n}P_r = \frac{n!}{(n-r)!} \qquad {}^{n}C_r = \frac{n!}{r!(n-r)!} \]
Pigeonhole Principle ☆
\[ n{>}m \Rightarrow \text{some container has} \ge \lceil n/m \rceil \]
n items, m containers

Can you recall the permutations & combinations formula?

Reveal formula
\[ {}^{n}P_r = \frac{n!}{(n-r)!} \qquad {}^{n}C_r = \frac{n!}{r!(n-r)!} \]
Reflexive needs every element
A relation is reflexive only if (a,a) is present for EVERY element a -- missing even one breaks it, and GATE tests this with small explicit sets where it's easy to miss one pair.
Equivalence vs. partial order
Equivalence relation = reflexive + symmetric + transitive. Partial order = reflexive + antisymmetric + transitive. These get mixed up constantly under time pressure.
n-1 edges alone isn't a tree
A connected graph with n-1 edges is a tree, but n-1 edges alone doesn't guarantee connectivity -- both conditions (connected AND n-1 edges, equivalently connected AND acyclic) must be checked.
Don't drop the triple-overlap term
In 3-set inclusion-exclusion, forgetting the final +|A intersect B intersect C| term is the single most common mistake.
Permutation vs. combination wording
Permutation = order matters (arrangements); combination = order doesn't (selections) -- GATE word problems often disguise which one actually applies.
Sheet 4

Numerical Methods

4 formulas
  • Newton-Raphson has quadratic convergence once close to the root; Bisection has only linear convergence but always converges once a root is bracketed
  • Simpson's 1/3 rule needs an EVEN number of sub-intervals; the trapezoidal rule works for any number
Newton-Raphson Method ☆
\[ x_{n+1} = x_n - \frac{f(x_n)}{f'(x_n)} \]
Bisection Method ☆
\[ c = \frac{a+b}{2} \]
valid when f(a)·f(b) < 0
Trapezoidal Rule ☆
\[ \int_a^b f(x)\,dx \approx \frac{h}{2}\Big[f(x_0)+2\sum f(x_i)+f(x_n)\Big] \]
h = (b−a)/n
Simpson's 1/3 Rule ☆
\[ \int_a^b f(x)\,dx \approx \frac{h}{3}\Big[f(x_0)+4\sum_{odd} f(x_i)+2\sum_{even} f(x_i)+f(x_n)\Big] \]
needs an even number of intervals

Can you recall the newton-raphson method formula?

Reveal formula
\[ x_{n+1} = x_n - \frac{f(x_n)}{f'(x_n)} \]
Newton-Raphson isn't guaranteed to converge
Newton-Raphson can fail to converge (or converge to the wrong root) if f'(x_n) is zero or the initial guess is far from the root -- unlike bisection, it has no guaranteed convergence.
Simpson's 1/3 needs an even interval count
Simpson's 1/3 rule needs an even number of sub-intervals -- an odd count means it can't be applied directly, a common numerical-methods setup error.
Bisection iterations follow a clean log formula
Bisection halves the interval every iteration -- the number of iterations needed for a given accuracy eps is ceil(log2((b-a)/eps)), a frequently tested numerical.
Quadratic convergence kicks in near the root
Higher-order convergence (Newton-Raphson) doesn't mean fewer total iterations from the very first step -- it means the error shrinks quadratically ONCE you're already close to the root.